Видео

We should all be glad that the nazis were socialists, things could have turned out much worse for the rest of the world if they weren’t

An excellent and informative video.

when your ideology kills millions, probably wasn't a very good idea.

Basically Lenin is a pre-TikTok Communist grifter who wants the soft girl life.

One could imagine a society with far less labour input if one combine it with intense digitalization and automatization. Of course, Marx did not imagine that given that very few imagined that (the sci fi of the 19th century imagined a continuation of the technologies developed during the 19th century, even if Jules Verne did envision video calls). In such a society, schools could for example be gameified to the extent that students could learn through for example performing mathematical tasks to enter an old Mayan temple with the purpose of stealing an orb.

@TIK Deep dive on the E.U.(S.S.R.) please.

Whoopi Goldberg makes the American mistake of seeing all racism as a ‘black vs white’ issue.

Evil

The middle has been seen as an enemy by the oligarchs long before they became the enemy of Lenin, Jack London wrote about it in "Iron heel" in 1908. Andrew Marr said that Lenin was transported in sealed wagon like bacillus, Trocki was another bacillus coming from the American banksters laboratory ruclips.net/user/clipUgkxY8iF-8FGsT7RUZWlURggo9AlvH2OVCG4

Reddit's gonna hate this one.

Air refuelling was experimented with in the 20's

I hate these vids. ; )))))) Not even two minutes in and you add to my reading list. : )))))) Lewis, I hope the rest is good enough to justify the comment.

1) it wasn't "Lenin's revolution" 2) capitalism hasn't improved lives of poor, it was technological progress that did it. Wrong premise 3) even 150 years after every Marx's predictions is still true. 4) free market didn't work even now, and always lead to concentration of capital in fewer hands, which exactly what was happening in Russia until revolution. 3) you just called economic theory based of math a religion... I'm facepalming after each of your sentence... But it's no wonder, because you took your information from books that put Lenin Stalin and Hitler in same row. I said it very rarely on RUclips, but you actually either 1) useful idiot, or 2) deliberately lying to your audience.

This is such a brilliant analysis...But socialists not only want to be dependent on the State: they want everyone to be. And that's where they clash with modern society despite the level of achievement that way of thinking has reached in the EU and the liberals in the US. And that's why both fear "communist" China: because embracing the most unhinged form of capitalism starting with the death of Mao Zedong got nearly a billion people out of poverty in less than thirty years. They don't want the "highly developed" societies of the West to find out they live by the principles of Socialism. Particularly those new elites who got an absolutely underserved position of power. I'm fighting the algorythm not to miss any of your uploads, TIK.

More than 95%of them are coming from keshmir not india indian just live there life

I agree with your view on socialism,but this rejection of altruism,duty,religion etc you continuously promote in your videos is as stupid as socialism and is the most nonsensical assertion,you can believe that you have a duty to your Religion,nation and familly or believe in helping the poor and the overal community(not necessarily through communistic social reform but through a personal and/or religious altruism without creating a communistic welfare state) without being a socialist.

Fun Facts : The First Communist revolution to be defeated , was by the German Social Democrat Govt in 1919 ... Lenin a Communist .. overthrew a moderate democratic Social Democrat govt to take power.. The Russian Civil war started with the democratic Socialist attacked the Communist for ignoring the election result .. they also wanted to get back in the war to support the USA , France & the UK ....

Liberalism did lead to degeneracy and eventually the modern left (though even the Victorians had utilitarian beliefs so the seed was there). The Progressives are able to take the framework of liberalism, and craft it into their ideology, it is the inevitable result. Eventually the Globalists and Progressives were gonna hack liberalism, it's inviable, it could never last, and personally I believe it was wrong anyway, rotten at the foundation because there should be a correct order. Sorry that I rambles I'm writing this very quickly whilst taking a break. Love your videos. God bless.

Guess the name of the majority party at the european parliament 😂?

What's the body count from Marx and Lenin's two-dimensional horse sh*t philosophy?

Based on things in this video, older videos and stuff from James Lindsey I feel confident to say that communism was supposed to be the dialectical negative to capitalism. It wasn’t, because dialectics aren’t real but that is what the idea was.

TIK is heavily wrong about jobs & slavery. If you do not have a capital, it is very hard to change job, especially radically. Car mechanic could want to be become musician, but he needs to pay rent & bills. Thus, he is forced to work on cars, even if he does not want to. Effectively, he is enslaved for the largest part of his working days, having only few hours for himself. Only people that inherit capital (Paris Hilton 😁) do have liberty of freely changing jobs and experimenting.

If you listen to some of his speeches (not easy if you are not german speaking) He often talks about the problems of mass imigration, as well as the sex/drugs/porn problems that were rampant in the US & Europe in the 1920s & 30s. Diluting the german nation traditions & heritage speed (not specifically the breeding part, but the cuture and values, this often gets miss interpreted) its quite similar to what is currently going on in the same areas. There's a reason it's not easy to hear his speeches in English. Im not saying what ultimately happened was good. I am saying like you say, no one on mass follows a madman, It's because he was trying to improve the country for the majority and the majority bought into it, desperate times = desperate meassures (the Versailles treaty after WW1 clearly didnt help and we have had basically almost a 100yr war from Franz Ferdinand's shooting, we just dont learn). The Scary thing Is I see many western ccountries at this same point now and its a pretty much no win, you either let the country be destroyed by uncontrolled migration & loss of values at a rate unsustainable, or take up the radical alternative and end up in another huge war. From what I have seen in the last year or two I think its the latter.

Best stalingrad series ive ever watched

Makes sense that socialism is rooted in self-hate, since most modern people are incredibly depressed and struggle to support themselves in life.

Nero, Lenin, Marx, Hitler... It is interesting, that so many of these monstrous people, thought of themselves as great artists.

As a leftist myself I wouldn't outright reject the assumption of fear of independence although I do not think that major socialist figures suffered much from that. I see it in another way: If independence is only thinkable in a system where there is because of the division of labour a lot of dependence and this interdependency of people is not capable of solving society's problems then not only are you individually incapable of solving big problems but also your independence is a fake one while you're still held accountable for inevitable failure. So yeah, this situation strikes me with fear but not the one where the implication is supposed to be that I'm just lazy.

I'm so glad you made this. Lenin is one of the people I'm most interested in that I know the least about. Such an important and scary man.

Ah this video will be great, the TRUTH will trigger many.

What are redemption juice?? 3:50

Lenin's communisme is repalacing the enslavement of the workers class to the bourgeoisie by the inslavement to the state , At least the bourgeoisie didot had the legal and the exécutive power of the state and thus getting the matter worse for the workers

All nazi flags were thrown to the ground in front of the Lenin's Mausoleum in Moscow. Nazis really hate Lenin.

Mental Illness 101.

Hope you continue this topic!

Thanks for bringing up the issue of Socialists actually meaning Dictatorship when they say Democracy.

omg ahahahahaha I didn't know TIK made a video visualising how much he is getting bullied

Socialism is the worst pen&paper RPG-system ever developed.

~22:00 Note that "The Burgeoisie" does not mean "The Rich", but does mean "The Middle Class". That is the class Socialism always seeks to eradicate. The "filthy rich" industrialists and nobles they do not really touch. The millionaires and billionaires that filthy rich Socialists love to complain about so much are not actually impeded by the Socialist scam. They merely establish themselves as the new rulers. Aristotle (in part as an answer to Platon) assessed correctly that the most stable society/state/government happens when there is a strong, large middle class, and tensions to the point of uprisings occur when there is little to no middle class, but that also tyranny is more likely to happen due to a lack of middle class (as the middle class could transition easier into the ruling class than the poor). Socialism always destroys the middle-class thus, to increase tensions to create its uprising, to have better flock for their preachers ("charmers", "people's leaders") to take over and create what Aristotle dubbed as "the people's government", the "worst form of Democracy that barely fulfils the criteria for a Democracy, which he later added rather contains all the worst elements of the worst forms of tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. It is thus the absolute worst form of government is and requires a total control state, a society without privacy, without trust, without friendship, with everyone ratting out everyone, including in the family, to the tyrannical government, and so on. He basically describes the foundation of what George Orwell wrote 1984 from. Because Orwell already knew what Socialists did, wanted to do, and dreamed about doing given the technology. The same with Stanislaw Lem. All worthy reads. Yes, Socialism is a religion, it always builds a personality cult, with the final "people's leader" being elevated to an untouchable, uncriticizable level of divinity, a god-emperor so to say, but one not built on virtue, but ego and for lack of a better term, sin. So in that sense it is rather a devil-emperor. Socialism is, ultimately, a scam for power and riches, for it never delivers on its promises but consistently delivers something else specifically: The total control hellscape tyranny with a devil-emperor at the top.

Around 1905 Alexander Bogdanov opened the first two communist universities in the world in Italy, one in Bologne and the other at Capri Island. Bogdanov was a scientist, writer and his basic culture came from the russian cosmist movment; while Lenin was jelous of Bogdanov successes, he feared to be dethroned by him (with no evidences of this but ok)..so he encouraged a political campaign against him to the point Bogdanov was forced to leave, and then he was called revisionist. Years later Bogdanov joined the comminists during the russian revolution (as like many cosmists, who after would been killed by the bolsheviks) and he died during blood experimentations. This man as others, as for me an example how Lenin was very rude and he envied the much better people who were inside the discontent movment in Russian Empire. He literally just wanted the absolute power. Still, many people today, professors aswell in some way or just in this way love him.

I get dumber listening to this twat. Tik no need to defend yourself from these people.

He turned out to be a far worse human after the revolution because he re-negged and cynically betrayed all the principles he spewed (like in State and Revolution"), for the sake of holding on to power. Turned out to be bloodlettinf fanatic.

21:40 This is a good point to help understand why Socialists are so obsessed with ants, or hive-insects in general (while completely ignoring that the individual ant is (epi-)genetically born into a specific job/class for life.

It's important you made this, as I feel there's lots of misconceptions about Lenin, The Bolsheviks and Late Tsarist/Early Revolutionary Russia. Also, when might we receive another video on Anarcho-Capitalism? Because I find this a promising idea, with lots of benefits, but there are certain things, most notably state security, by that I mean how with out an organised society and military it would be to invade an Anarcho-Capitalist country(such as Australia if it were to be one, which is where I live, being an easy target for China). Also just some overall details on how things would run.

~18:00 This is why people who wave their arms "Nonono, I'm not a crazy dangerous Communist! I'm just a Socialist!" are either ignorant of their own ideology, or simply lying. Socialism is a total control tyranny of the worst kind, with the claim that it is a necessity for the purpose to reach Communism eventually. So if you do not want to reach Communism, then why even build this tyrannical total control hellhole? There's no good reason to do that. However, if it is an honest Socialist who admits it is to reach Communism... well, Communism is a utopian idea. U-topos: The un-place, the un-city, the unreachable place. It cannot be reached. So why create a total control tyranny hellhold in order to try to reach something that can never be? There's no good reason to do that, it is pure delusion, fiction, belief, faith. And it is way more nonsensical than any belief in some paradise after death, for the latter can neither be proven nor denied, but the physical reality, while alive, utopia is always unreachable by definition. Thus making it completely irrational to pursue. Virtuous aims can be pursued to aim yourself onto a path of virtue, even though the individual likely never reaches perfection, never embodies Jesus or the Buddha fully, but it sets you on the right path. The path to the unreachable Communism however forces you onto the unvirtuous path of all and creates hell on earth instead of virtue. Hence we get virtue signalers with substance, that are obsessed with maintaining an illusion - just as Socialism is solely obsessed with maintaining the illusion that it "works" for the people when really it is nothing but a scam to exploit them.

Well, just got my anti-socialism booster. And I didn't need any mRNA tech to get it. Eat it, Pfizer. Don't know where TIK gets all this analysis, but I bet it has something to do with reading and critical thinking. Things virtually absent from any governmental actions.

😂 Gulags were adult schools in soviet union for uneducated people 😂

In Aldi's early socialist countries, VERY HARD LABOR was mandated. Not working wasn't just likely to lead to poverty, but it was likely to lead to forced labor in a prison camp.

That's not even remotely a beer a day. Truly poor times... :(

Britain and France were making plans to attack Russia in the Russo Finnish war even though Britain and France were officially at war with Germany. It was the Nazi Soviet pact that caused Britain to declare war on Germany judging by the fact that the guarantee of Poland's independence was before the Pact was made public, but when they found out about the Pact Britain guaranteed Poland's _ territory_ and that was what made war inevitable. Chamberlain had no problem with Germany going East and maybe even succeeding and conquering some Soviet land, or it was at least acceptable. Germany and Soviet Russia being allies was unacceptable, because that meant Hitler was about to go West (first).

I thought TOTALITARIAN was an upgrade from AUTHORITARIAN in that heavy Mind Control was a part of it, like Mao's interrogation & re-education torture camps, where they make you be a snitch on your friends and try to make you a True Believer.